A Night to Forget...

 In order to draw a hasty veil over last night's proceedings, we will keep this match report relatively brief. We were reasonably evenly matched on paper against Solihull B, and actually outpointed them in terms of our grading average, but it was fair to say that little went our way.

I was the first to finish, on Board 2 against Julian Summerfield. Not the most exciting of games, it has to be said. A lot of wood came off early, and there was no real way for either side to make progress. I've not had the best of records against Julian in the last couple of years, so was happy enough. We retreated to the bar and had a very nice drink and a catch up. I think both feeling that Kenilworth probably had the edge in the other three games. Still, as we all know, there is many a slip between cup and lip...

Michal had snatched the poisoned "b" pawn, on Board 1 against Tony Sadler, but seemed to have digested it pretty well. Unfortunately, a slight miscalculation saw a promising position turn to dust, and we were down 1.5 - 0.5.

Dhairya's position out of the opening against Ian Brodie on Board 3 was as wild as ever. However, for once, I feared it wasn't better. Yet Dhairya seemed to gradually improve the situation and was certainly winning at one point. However, post my return from the bar, something had clearly gone awry, and he was down a piece. Credit to Dhariya for proceeding to make Ian work exceptionally hard, before finally succumbing when both were below a minute on the clock.

The heartbreak of the night award goes to Solomon, who completely bossed his game against Matthew Allen. At every stage he had the initiative and seemed to be making good choices, without yielding a breakthrough. Finally a pawn race ensued. Matthew queened a move earlier, but Solomon queened with check and still seemed to have the play. However, when the checks petered out, the key factor was the better positioning of Matthew's King. Ultimately the black monarch and consort worked exceptionally well together. Solomon's pawns dropped off and the game was lost. Painful to watch and I'm sure even more so to play. We've all been there. Such is the life of a chess player.

So, a disappointing evening, but these things happen. We know we can do better, and will look to put things right in next week's cup game against the same opponents.

  

6 Match Reports in One Week - Another New Record!

I'm having trouble keeping up with all these matches, but I've finally got around to last Thursday's A team league encounter away at Banbury A. So for two whole days I'll be up to date, until yet another two matches crop up on Monday and Tuesday and its back to square one.

For the second Thursday in succession, Jude, Javier and Joshua (the 3-Jays, not to be confused with The O-Jays!) found themselves facing an away trip to Banbury, which must be just about our longest trip of the season. After a good win in the KO Cup Semi-Final, the previous week, it was back to league action this time around, as the A team set about trying to bridge the yawning 3 point gap which the B team had established at the top of Division 1 a few days earlier. 

Banbury have a pretty strong and solid team, which can become very strong when IM James Jackson makes an appearance, as he did when Banbury beat us in the reverse fixture earlier this season and administered our only loss to date. He was missing this time, though, which left us rating favourites, but with tough games likely on all boards.

Joshua played his normal gung-ho style on Board 4 against Nathan Manley, sacrificing a pawn (modest by his standards) but he had failed to notice that the queens could instantly be forced off, and it was soon a rook and pawn ending where he was just a pawn down. However, he seemed to defend quite easily and eventually a position was reached where Joshua could claim a threefold repetition. With about 40 minutes on his clock, though, to Nathan's 2, he decided to wait and see what happened on the other boards first. What a team player!

And in fact things were certainly going our way elsewhere. Jude looked right back to form as he had won an exchange against Tom Day on Board 1 and soon made the extra material tell, while on Board 2 Javi played yet another excellent game against Georgs Vikanis and his pieces jumped all over the White position to make decisive material gains. Very impressive stuff. 

So Joshua was able to take the draw and clinch the match victory, which left me in play against Danut Joian. The game was level for a long way, but I had an extra pawn, so obviously I was trying to win. Eventually Danut allowed me to open up a kingside file for my rook to come into the game and this should have been decisive. But I played one careless move in time trouble and after an excellent response it was suddenly level again. At which point I played what looked like a crushing pawn sac to get a new queen, and this so confused the situation that it did indeed win - even though a hidden resource meant it should have been just level again. And even then there was time for me to go wrong again and blunder back into another drawing line, but by this time Danut's clock situation was as bad as mine and he failed to find the draw.

This was another big win for us against tough opposition on a very rainy night in Georgia, sorry Banbury. (Can you guess what song's coming?) So the B team's lead is back to 1 point again, and its then 5 points back to third place Stratford A. The A team is in action again next week, so it could be all change. Watch this space! 

5 Match Reports in One Week - a New Record!

There's been a virtual tsunami of match reports on the website this week - so many in fact that I felt obliged to step aside for a day or two for fear of being swamped. But - finally - there seems to be a bit of breathing space, so the story of our Coventry League KO Cup Semi Final win over Coventry C can now be told.

Truth to tell, there isn't a lot to report. We had to win 3-1, because as a Division 2 team, Coventry C got a 1.25 handicap start, but in the end we managed 4-0, so we made it comfortably enough into the final, where we will play Coventry A on March 19th. Yet again, Coventry have been given home advantage, which I find slightly irksome, but at least this time they will have to play with increment and not that absolutely awful G90 time control they are allowed to get away with in the league.

The story of the Semi-Final essentially boils down to the bizarre happenings on board 4 - of which more later. Bruce was first to win, delivering mate with a rook on the seventh and a swarm of minor pieces around the Black king which had been driven to the queenside. I'm sure that I've already seen Bruce play that exact attack about 3 times this season. Once his g2 bishop escapes down the diagonal, he is like a man possessed! I won on Board 3 against David Copson, though not without some anxiety, as I allowed/forced a piece sac in the opening which should have netted 3 pawns (I only bargained on 2!) but a terrible oversight by White did indeed keep it at 2, and at the cost of a second piece to boot. I subsequently won an exchange, and then a whole queen, at which point the game ended. Javi had a tougher task on Board 1, with Black against Katia, whose presence in any Kenilworth teams this season has sadly been very rare. Javi just did what he seems to do in every match at the moment - played a number of good moves and won! This time in a rook ending with two extra pawns and a dominant king.

So having reached the target of 3, I was relatively relaxed as I watched the conclusion of Harry's game against former long-time Kenilworth resident Simon Weaver. For the early part of the game, though, I was anything but relaxed, as Harry put his queen on a rather dodgy square in the opening, and I was somewhat concerned it might drop off at any moment. Additionally, he had played g3 on about move 4, but then never got around to putting his bishop on g2. Or h3. Or anywhere, in fact! But I shouldn't have been concerned, as it was, bizarrely, actually Simon who got his queen trapped on b6, and it could only be extricated by giving up a knight. Game over, I thought, especially when Harry got to a position of Rook and 2 bishops against Rook and knight. Until, that is, Harry forked a rook on e8 and a pawn on c6 with a bishop on d7, having failed to notice the Black knight on f6 which simply took the bishop. game on! Thi9ngs then got further out of control, as Harry swapped bishop for knight and gave Black a passed d pawn, supported by both his rook and a strong king. He was fighting this with a passed e pawn of his own and it soon developed into a race. Harry played the complications really well, though, and eventually reached the most winning king and pawn ending you could ever wish to see. And indeed he won it, but not without some serious brain fade moments along the way!

But now for the extenuating circumstances - it turns out Harry had had a very intensive day of board meetings at work and also wasn't feeling at all well. So it was a bit of a miracle that he actually made it to the match and kept awake long enough to get the win! Thanks Harry - but I'll still have to take the mickey out of you about this for a while yet!!

Some great music to accompany this report - prompted by Harry's condition and a couple of lines in the song:- "I make sure I work till I'm so damned tired; way too tired to think."

Not Our Knight...

Sometimes it is when you come up short, that you realise how much progress you have actually made. Leamington A v Kenilworth D would have sounded like a real mismatch in years gone by. However, this season sees us as rivals at the business end of Division 2. 

We went into the match unbeaten in the League against all teams other than our own C team, but it was clear from the outset that it was going to be tough. Leamington's Board 4 was higher rated than I was on Board 1 for Kenilworth, but the match itself was very competitive, even if it was clear that Leamington always had the edge.

Solomon answered the call at short notice, and resisted well on Board 4 against Andy Collins. However, credit to Andy who built up a blistering kingside attack. Pawns rolled, rooks occupied menacing files, and eventually the defences around Solomon's king were breached. Certainly a decent game.

On Board 3 Bernard and Ola played out a very complex and double-edged encounter. It was not entirely clear to me who stood better (at a pinch I would say Ola) but possibilities abounded for both players, and I was unsurprised when the two of them decided discretion was the better part of valour and agreed a draw.

All of which left me against Tom Darling and Phil against Ben Egid. My game with Tom was very interesting. I had the bishop pair and the better pawn structure, Tom had the attack. When he sacrificed a pawn that I had no choice but to take, I feared the worst, but managed to build a good defence. With my king on g2 and my own rooks on the h-file, I certainly had equality, if not slightly more. However, bafflingly given the amount of Bullet chess I play, for the second night in a row I was running on vapours timewise. Phil's position looked pretty dire to me by this point, so with the match looking lost, I agreed the draw.

Phil and dodgy knight moves have a bit of a history (as I recall from my own Leamington days.) Last night, we had a variation on a theme, when Ben Egid moved his king into a knight check and pressed the clock. Tom immediately intervened and we agreed to give Phil an extra two minutes. However, while this gave Phil 12 minutes to Ben's 2, Phil's position was still horrible. Ben could not stop laughing at his inadvertent error and there were twenty seconds or so when I wondered whether Phil might win on time, but sadly for us Ben composed himself. Once he had, pretty much anything won and so it proved.

So not our "knight". But this doesn't detract from a really good season and we'll be back in action next week against Solihull! 

My debut post....(pt2)

 Can you really make a debut twice...not sure about that but anyway to continue from where I left off.

This week saw the C team take on Banbury B. They are bottom of the league with only 1 win all season and we were on a run of 3 victories in a row. Plus the D team powered to a 3-1 victory against them just the week before. Easy victory then, points basically in the bag. Well, if only chess was as simple as that.......

Firstly I should add that their only victory this season was against us in the reverse fixture. Secondly, they are actually a strong team who have lost 5 of their games by 2.5-1.5 (Note to Joshua, some teams have to be on the receiving end of that scoreline.......) so it was never going to be easy.....

And then there is my personal form which is all over the place. I have played a coupe of good games that I have lost and a number of poor games that I have won - not sure what to make of that.....

So, first result on the Board was mine again. Another fast playing opponent in Chris Evans. Actually he did not like my Sicilian defence which slowed him down (he told me afterwards he has been playing the Vienna for 40 years so I am glad I didn't play e5!) but unfortunately I did not like it either and ended up very cramped and pushed the wrong pawn at the wrong time to try to create some space. Luckily for me he got over-excited and instead of taking a marginally better endgame a pawn up he went for broke sacrificed a Knight and the position promptly fell apart, handing me another exchange and simultaneously losing all attacking threat. Lucky me! 1-0.

This left me plenty of time to see the other games which all looked very tight. Ben on Board 4 (Paul Badger now being in warmer climes waiting for some cricket action - I hope you enjoy Paul!!) had a Queen vs Queen plus lots of pawns endgame and was very low on time but found a perpetual. A wise choice by Ben and a 1/2 point secured (as an aside - I thought it was very amusing when Ben announced a draw offer to his opponent, after the position had been repeated once, who then got up and checked out the state of the remaining games as if there was potential to play on for more!)

This left Keatan on Bd 1 vs Mal Waddell in a Rook and Pawns endgame, and Bernard on Bd2, in another very complicated position with lots of pieces on the Board. Slight problem was that Keatan had 2 minutes versus his opponent 25 (!) and the position was far from clear. When Keatan was down to 1min27 secs he offered a draw (having earlier had one turned down) and to my surprise it was accepted - Keatan was definitely not better at that point in the game). I think that his opponent was probably aware of Keatan's higher grade but also had looked at Bernard's game where he had just lost a pawn and may have thought they were going to get something out of the game.....anyway all gifts are well received - so game state was 2-1 with Bernard still playing.

I thought Bernard's game looked tricky and set for a long drawn out affair but Bernard expertly sacrificed another pawn (temporarily) to exchange off everything but an opposite coloured pair of Bishops, took back one of the pawns and was suddenly in a dead drawn position. A great liquidation to secure a half point and the game for us so our run continues.....

We are now clear in second in the League but have 3 tricky games left and Leamington A are in a very strong position at the top.....but you never know.....

My debut post.....(pt1)

 Clearly I can't live up to the standard set by my fellow bloggers but I thought it bad form to leave the C team without updates on here.....

Since the turn of 2024 the C team have been following the trend of all of the other Kenilworth teams this year, we have been winning. Turning our pre-Christmas draws and losses into narrow wins. Now, I am happy to claim full credit for this as this turning of the tide has corresponded with my self-demotion to Board 4, but that would be to not recognise the impact of Keatan who has moved from Board 1 on the D team to Board 1 on the C team and continues to have a very strong season.

Last week we defeated Olton B 2.5-1.5 (we drew with them earlier in the season). My game finished first as my opponent Andrew Cottom plays at a rate of knots (mainly due to his discomfort with sitting down I think) that meant our 45 move game was over while Bernard was still on move 12....anyway I was not playing very well (another theme of the season) but got into a Bishop vs Knight endgame where my opponent overstepped thinking he was going to fork me with his pesky Knight but actually helped me secure an outside passed pawn which, when I exchanged the minor pieces, won the game for me. This left me plenty of time to see Keatan squeeze Robert Reynolds on Board 1 (much to my amusement, I thought Keatan had overlooked an earlier winning move but on review of the game I was wrong and Keatan's play perfectly pushed home his advantage - what do I know!!). Paul then delivered a solid draw from slight time pressure in a Bishop vs Knight endgame that secured the point. This left Bernard playing what looked a(nother) very complicated position with a lot of pieces still on the Board. It suddenly took a turn for the worst as the time got low and his opponent emerged with a won position but the points were already secured by then....onwards and upwards....

Top of the league (temporarily) - part 4

After a win against Shirley A last week (2.5-1.5 of course, with Paul Badger our match winner), another match victory over Stratford somewhat miraculously puts Kenilworth B 3 points clear at the top of the table. It won’t last, but why spoil a good time with the truth.

My game against Sam Cotterill was, not unusually, the first one to finish. It ended rather abruptly as a contest on move 16, with white to play in the position below. 

Black has just played Qd8-Qe8 to break the pin along the d file, and try and deal with the currently uncapturable bishop on g5. Unfortunately, this seems to lose immediately, after a trade of bishops and Qb7. 

Suddenly, with Ne5 to follow and no way to break the new and worse pin, black is losing material and the game. After I played an incredibly boring Colle System opening to reach that position, I may have discovered something no-one else has thought of in chess history – if you play sound openings and positions, tactics often work out in your favour. I’m sure it won’t last, but I feel good to have had an entirely original chess idea.

Andrew Paterson was playing with against Ben Larkin, and they reached a to me slightly confusing position. Basically, it was normal-ish Queen’s pawn position, but black for no clear reason had pushed his a pawn all the way to a3. For quite some time it looked like that pawn should just drop off, but it never did, and became more and more of a thorn in Andrew’s position. Eventually he decided to sacrifice a rook, for tactical compensation that unfortunately did not exist. He ended up with three pawns for a piece, but unfortunately Ben’s remaining queen and bishop were able to whip up some very nasty threats against Andrew’s king, so down he went. 1-1 for the match.

Andy Baruch was next to finish, with a very nice win with the black pieces against Richard McNally. Andy played a slightly off-beat and slow double fianchetto as black, which was an excellent choice as it prevented Richard from launching his trademark sacrificial attacks. In a slow manoeuvring position, Andy was always on topic, obtaining a good knight against a bad bishop, winning a pawn, and winning the game. The endgame a protected passed pawn up took longer to win than I had expected, but result was never in much doubt. 2-1 and looking good thus far.

Mike, meanwhile, was paying the black side of a Benoni against a new Stratford recruit, Alex Roberts. White played in a trademark Benoni style, playing 35 and building up some scary pawns in the centre. Mike, by contrast, instead of the standard Benoni queenside counterplay, managed to end up with double, isolated, passed d pawns – not something you see very often. Unfortunately, white’s more active pieces started to take over the game, and Mike was soon very much on the back foot and short on time, with pawns starting to drop off. Just as I was resigning myself to a drawn match however, his opponent got overexcited, pushed his king forward too quickly, and Mike was able to arrange a perpetual check to win us the match. He may even have had more, but I for one am very happy with Mike for taking the draw to win the match at this point.

However, no-one really cares about the games; what we care about is this table.

8 wins in the season, and 7 of those by a 2.5-1.5 margin. It also means if our A team starts to lose some matches, we could yet end up winning the league. By coincidence, I happen to have been roped in to play for our A team against Banbury this Thursday. For some unaccountable reason, I just have this nagging feeling that I might not play very well in that match.

A tale of two rules violations

In Mark's absence gallivanting around the healthcare system, just putting in a quick report on the recent KO cup semi-final. I'll get the boring chess out the way quickly; we beat Banbury 3.5-1.5, with wins for Javier (comfortably), Andy P (concerningly, from a dubious position where he had 6 isolated pawns) and myself (very dubiously, winning a pawn down endgame for one of many times in my life). That takes us into a final against Stratford, for which hopefully Mark will be back to write something more interesting than I can manage.

Speaking of uninteresting things I'm writing, the main thing I wanted to bring up were two rules issues that occurred on the night, which others may know more about how they should have been resolved than I did.

1) About 2 hours into the match, it was noticed that two of the clocks had been set up incorrectly (by our Banbury hosts I hasten to add, and not by us), and did not have an increment on them. For anyone particularly boring who wants to know how, they had been set up as 15 minutes and 10 seconds with a 0 second increment, rather than 15 minutes and 0 seconds with a 10 second increment. The question then was what to do. In my official position as the only man who can work the clocks, I suggested we put the increment on from that move onwards, but not add any time for the moves that had elapsed. Was this correct? You could have added back the increment time, or left it without increment because it had started that way. No-one had any better suggestions at the time, but I'm certainly not sure of the correct rules.

2) Andy Baruch was playing Nathan Manley on board 4. In Nathan's traditional style he got short of time very quickly (this was also one of the boards without increment, which didn't help him at all). He got down to less than 5 minutes and so correctly stopped recording his moves. Andy, I think slightly thrown by how fast his opponent was now playing, also forgot to record his moves. A couple of times Nathan reminded him and Andy would start again, but forget a few moves down the line. I took no action at this as I'm fairly confident I'm not allowed to interrupt the game unless one of the players stops the clock to raise something. However, if Nathan had done this, what would have been the correct response? Give him two extra minutes and remind Andy to record from that point on. Make Andy catch up on all the moves he has missed before he plays again? Something else?

Fortunately, none of this affected our overall victory in the match, but I would be interested in knowing the answers, if anyone has them.

A Win's a Win for A' That .....

 ..... as Ayrshire Match Captain Robert Burns wrote back in 1795, after a narrow victory over Clackmannanshire in the Lowland League. A sentiment echoed by my good self after last night's narrow 2.5-1.5 Coventry League victory over a hitherto pointless Rugby A.

It all seemed to be going pretty well (myself excepted!) early on, with Bernard R in seeming total control against Dave Riley on Board 4, Mike doing what Mike does with the White pieces on 3 and Javi slowly getting the upper hand on top board. But then total calamity - Bernard's crushing position suddenly became a lost position after a terrible mistake and we were one down. Thankfully, I had just about crawled into a playable position, but it was very complicated, as I had a queen for two rooks. There was an exchange of mistakes, and suddenly I was winning, but then it was level-ish. Then I was winning again after cheapoing the exchange, but I blundered a pawn and had to bail out with perpetual.

But almost immediately Mike delivered checkmate against Tom Burgess. He had been up two exchanges, and despite dropping one was still winning when Tom moved his king to the wrong square and the game ended dramatically. So all square and everything rested on Javi's game against Paul Colburn. Thankfully he was always better after an Alekhine's Defence and played what looked like an excellent, controlled game, making a big queenside advance, winning an exchange and then giving it back to force liquidation followed by a pawn promotion. Classy, match winning stuff!

This has cemented our second place in Division 1, where we trail 100% Warwick Uni A by a point, but have played a game more. With three matches left, we now have University teams only to play, including two against their hitherto all conquering A team. We'll just have to give it our best shot.

Which leads very nicely on to this week's song. And just be thankful that I cut out 60 seconds of audience clapping and cheering at the start! Got to love the hairstyles, though, haven't you?!

Hat-trick Heroes!

 Last night the D team completed the double in the League against Banbury B, to add to our triumph against the Banbury squad in the cup. Three matches we can most definitely be very proud of!

We were delighted to welcome Michal Bylica, who made his debut on Board 1, of which more later...

By some quirk of fate I was the only Kenilworth player to play in both League games, which really underscores our bench strength. As in the previous two fixtures, I was white against Mal Waddell, this time on Board 2. Mal had to take a call before the game started, and was late to the Board, but in many ways this was the least interesting of the games in our mini-series (albeit that was more than compensated for by the fireworks elsewhere!) An early queen exchange was followed by more wood being swapped. We eventually reached an ending where we both had a light squared bishop, a knight and six pawns. Mal had the edge as my pawns were essentially all on the light squares, but he had no entry points. Once I had demonstrated that I had a full blockade, we split the point and focussed on enjoying the melee in the other three matches.

Dhairya played brilliantly against Chris Evans on three. As if often the case in games involving Chris, the position was ablaze within moments of the start. Dhairya landed his queen on h4 and knight on g4 and both sides appeared to have a host of wild tactical threats at their disposal. Chris is normally a speed merchant, but the fact that he was taking his time, said a lot about how complex the game truly was. Essentially after the dust settled, Dhairya appeared to be well on top, but a slightly inaccurate capturing sequence allowed Chris back into the game. A queening race ensued, with the rarest of sights, four queens in play in a game that was still in the balance. Dhairya was very short of time, but had the tempo and bravely turned down the draw to bring home the full point. An absolutely fantastic effort, and this was the game I've most enjoyed watching as the captain this season. Well done Dhairya!

On Board 1, Michal also battled the clock. I thought Paul Rowen was better out of the opening, and he appeared to have strong threats against Michal's king. I did not see the critical moments in this one, so I'm not sure if Paul tried a sacrifice that did not quite come off, or if Michal landed a tactical blow of his own, but either way, Michal repelled Paul's attack and ended significantly up on material. Unfortunately Paul had a perpetual (but not much else). The drama was heightened as Paul let his clock run, while watching Solomon's game against Barry Kagan on Board 4, but the reality was he had no option but to force the draw or lose, and after a few minutes peace was agreed. A terrific debut by Michal, to hold the draw on Board 1 with black (with Paul being the one who had ultimately clung on.)

All of which left the score at 2-1 to us, with Solomon and Barry battling it out in front of a cluster of spectators. I thought Solomon had been better the whole game, and when he found a nice tactic to pick up a pawn, and opened up Barry's king, it seemed victory was close. However, with both players at about three minutes, Solomon slightly lost control, and Barry landed several tactical blows which narrowed Solomon's advantage. In the dying moments, Solomon gave up his queen for two rooks and the combination of his grip on the seventh rank and Barry's collapsing queen side proved too much. Barry lost on time in a position where he was a handful of moves away from losing on the board. A really good effort from Solomon. Strong play throughout and he really held his nerve at the end in a situation where a strong temperament was vital. 

So we continue our climb up the table. We have two more League games and a cup semi-final against Solihull to come this month. We always said this team had the ability to have a good season, and a strong League finish and silverware remain in our sights!