While I was away sunning myself in Eastbourne for the weekend, we only went and won a National Trophy. Of sorts. I should go away more often. (Especially after last night, for news of which see the next post.) Our intrepid Captain and Roving Reporter Ben Graff now takes up the story. And one of these days, quite soon even, the Webmaster may enable him to post his own reports. Take it away, Ben .....
Day 1
On day 1 the
team consisted of Joshua, me, Mike and John. After the usual team hugs, singing
of the club song and saluting of the Kenilworth flag, we were in high spirits.
(OK, strictly speaking we didn’t do any of these things. But after some cups of
tea and a catch up, we took to our Boards for the first round in high spirits.)
This was the point at which things started to go wrong.
We were involved
in triangular matches on both the Saturday and the Sunday. This meant that by
the end of each day, we had played two teams in full (Newport and Sutton
Coldfield on the Saturday, Braille 1 and Warley Quinborne on the Sunday.)
However, it was only at the end of the second and fourth rounds that the full
scores against each opponent were known. Sounds complicated? Add in the fact
that the Boards were wrongly set up so that we almost started round 1 with four
blacks and in the wrong part of the playing hall and I guess you could say that
it was! Anyways, that’s our excuse for a seriously below par first day.
An hour into
round one, slight alarm bells began to ring for me. Both Mike and I were very
passive with Black and appeared to have limited winning chances. (So it proved.
Mike was the first to finish, expertly defending accurately in an opposite
Bishop ending. I finished next when we got down to Queen and six v Queen and
six, in a completely static position. One of the most boring draws I’ve had all
season.) In contrast it is fair to say Joshua and John’s games were a lot more “dynamic,”
but that was probably the best that could be said for them. Chris Lewis got his
Queen in behind Joshua’s pawns, causing all sorts of problems. He ultimately
broke through in the ending to win. John also went down after a really tough
fight, so not a great start.
Round 2 saw
me up against Nathanael Paul. Triangulation meant that despite being our Board
2 I had to play Newport’s Board 1. Given he was 177 I steadied myself for a
long game and fuelled up on Pizza at lunchtime. A series of events unfolded
that should give hope to all of us when we sit down opposite a higher rated
player. With my Queen on e2 and Nathanial’s Bishop on f5, I attacked it by
placing a knight on g3. Nathanial’s enterprising attempt to defend it with e6
was somewhat thwarted as after I took the Bishop with said knight his e6 pawn
could not take back as it was pinned to the King. The game lasted six moves and
ten minutes… I doubt there have been many easier ways to get a 227 ECF for a
game! However, after that it was all downhill. Joshua incredibly was up the
exchange and cruising to victory when things went terribly wrong. He’d declined
several draw offers and saw the chance to grab a second exchange. However, this
was a disaster as it then transpired he couldn’t stop his opponent’s pawns from
rolling down the board. Ouch. John was also winning before he lost and Mike
went down too, so it was a somewhat dispirited team that ended day 1…
Kenilworth
|
143
|
Newport
|
148
|
|||||
721
|
w
|
Pink, Joshua
|
178
|
0
- 1
|
Lewis, Christopher D
|
159
|
||
722
|
w
|
Graff, Ben
|
145
|
1
- 0
|
Paul, Nathanael
|
177
|
||
723
|
b
|
Johnson, Mike
|
126
|
½
- ½
|
Paul, Christopher
|
120
|
||
724
|
b
|
Harris, John
|
125
|
0
- 1
|
Ansari, Athar
|
139
|
||
1½
- 2½
|
Sutton Coldfield 2
|
131
|
Kenilworth
|
143
|
|||||
711
|
W
|
Brown, Noel A
|
127
|
1
- 0
|
Pink, Joshua
|
178
|
||
712
|
W
|
Lawrence, Roy
|
137
|
½
- ½
|
Graff, Ben
|
145
|
||
713
|
B
|
Marks, Robert
|
136
|
1
- 0
|
Johnson, Mike
|
126
|
||
714
|
B
|
Brown, Noel A
|
127
|
1
- 0
|
Harris, John
|
125
|
||
3½
- ½
|
Day 2
We told
ourselves that tomorrow was another day and so it proved. Roy came into the
team for Mike (as planned) and we got down to business. As the expletive free
minutes ticked by, it was becoming clear that Roy was on good form. He finished
round three first with a good draw, bringing us some much needed stability. How
many times have we said that this season? [Ed – not many.] John also very
comfortably held the draw. Indeed he stood better at the end, but it seemed
like a sensible decision to get us another half point in the bank. Fears were
beginning to circulate that Joshua’s non-Chess playing twin brother had turned
up in his place for the weekend, when he began the round by “sacrificing,” a
pawn for very little. However, by mid-way through the game, he’d been exposed
to enough Southern air to begin thinking clearly again and normal business was
resumed. He regained the pawn, capitalised on his better pawn structure and
eventually won a Rook whilst his opponent was trying to hold his structure
together. The win soon followed. I was last to finish. Up against someone who
had bored me into a draw a few years ago, we reached the same result via a more
interesting game (to a point.) I pressed hard and had the better chances, but
he defended very solidly. It’s fair to say that I gave his treatment of
opposite coloured Bishop’s more scrutiny than was strictly warranted, you can but
try… A better round and we knew we were in the hunt to win both our matches.
The afternoon
saw Joshua fully back on form race to a comfortable victory. Roy got caught by
a threatened horrendous fork/ mating attack and had to give up a piece to
survive. Unfortunately there was no way back and he eventually went down. John
again held his own easily for a comfortable draw, which left me against recent Warwickshire Captain Simon
Smith (another 170.) It was a case of so close. I was much better out of the
opening and won a pawn. I defended well in the middle game and was clearly
winning the ending. However, both his technique and the clock began to tell. He
created some threats I didn’t expect and basically playing off ten second
increments I countered them, but surely not with the best line. To my horror
what I thought was going to be an easy win ended up with me with Rook and two
vs Rook (but the pawns were fragmented on the h and f files.) Hoh hum... I
didn’t find the right approach and after 90+ moves we agreed a draw. Some
future learning for me but an interesting game. [Ben is being rather hard on himself here - as long as the defending king is able to block the pawns, this ending is a theoretical draw - Mark]
Braille 1
|
129
|
Kenilworth
|
142
|
||||||||||||
w
|
Pennington, Graham
|
138
|
0
- 1
|
Pink, Joshua
|
178
|
||||||||||
w
|
Blencowe, Ian P
|
133
|
½
- ½
|
Graff, Ben
|
145
|
||||||||||
b
|
Lovell, Stan E
|
124
|
½
- ½
|
Harris, John
|
125
|
||||||||||
b
|
Gordon, Philip
|
121
|
½
- ½
|
Watson, Roy
|
121
|
||||||||||
1½
- 2½
|
|||||||||||||||
Kenilworth
|
142
|
Warley Quinborne
|
136
|
||||||||||||
w
|
Pink, Joshua
|
178
|
1
- 0
|
Holowczak, Alex R
|
145
|
||||||||||
w
|
Graff, Ben
|
145
|
½
- ½
|
Smith, Simon C
|
171
|
||||||||||
b
|
Harris, John
|
125
|
½
- ½
|
Pakenham, John H
|
103
|
||||||||||
b
|
Watson, Roy
|
121
|
0
- 1
|
Hussain, Adrian
|
126
|
||||||||||
2
- 2
|
Final
thoughts
A very
enjoyable weekend. On another day we might have got closer to the real prizes,
but it wasn’t to be on this occasion. The reality was that winning the Plate
somewhat masked the fact that we were lower in the overall standings than we
would have hoped. That said, it was great to have Kenilworth in the competition
and I’m sure we’ll give it another go next season. Next year we definitely will
kick off with some team hugs, singing and flag saluting – surely if we’d done
that this time things would have been very different! J
No comments:
Post a Comment