The A team, at our fourth attempt, finally managed a win
yesterday, with a reasonably comfortable 3-1 triumph over Shirley. I’ll go over
the less interesting matches quickly, before we get to the main event.
The first game to finish was Dave’s, who had black
against Jonathan Dale. In a Qc2 Nimzo-Indian white played rather passively,
and hence Dave seemed to get a very equal position without too much difficulty.
When white then left his kingside rather exposed, Dave turned down the opportunity
to win a couple of pawns (which may have in turn given his opponent an attack),
and instead found a tactical way to win a queen for a rook and knight. I
thought perhaps he could have played on a little here, but his opponent’s position
was solid and a draw with black can hardly be considered a bad result.
Mark then put us into the lead, courtesy of a win over
Keith Ingram. In a Najdorf Sicilian, White chose what looked to me a slightly
strange mix of plans, retreating his knights to b3, but then choosing to castle
kingside and play f4. Mark was left with an isolated pawn on d6, but as compensation
had excellent squares for his pieces, and was able to simplify into a double
rook endgame a pawn up. He was soon able to put both his rooks on the seventh
rank, and even someone whose endgame technique is as rudimentary as mine knows
that such a position should be winning sooner rather than later.
The first half of my own game, with white against Matthew
Long, went well, as we played into a relatively main line of the Winawer French
(e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4) where white plays an early Qg4. I carefully pointed all
my pieces towards the black kingside, then realised he hadn’t actually castled
yet and if he did so queenside they would all turn out to be on the wrong side
of the board. However, much to my surprise and relief, he did castle kingside
and soon I had a very strong attack, and a position rated +3 by the computer. However,
here my own incompetence as an attacking player took over, so that rather than
delivering mate, I smoothly managed to transition into an endgame a pawn down.
Fortunately for me, the opposite coloured bishops meant I was able to hold on
relatively easily, leaving us 2-1 ahead.
Moving on to our feature presentation. I think it is fair to say
that Phil has been somewhat out of form over the last few months, and has been
subjected to a fair amount of gentle abuse as a consequence (and at least some
genuine rage after last season’s game in Stratford.) Therefore, by way of
balance, it seems only right to present his crushing victory over a 160 graded
player on board 4 that sealed the win. I’m sure we all hope this means the real
Phil is now back for league chess, and the piece blundering one only shows up
in future for Thursdays at The Royal Oak. I haven’t had time to put the game through
a computer so there will be a lack of good analysis to go with it, but I think the
ease of the win speaks for itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment